Punnag Ghaisas - Assistant Editor for Discover Journals - LinkedIn Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. sinastria di coppia karmica calcolo; quincy homeless shelter; plastic bags for cleaning oven racks; claudia procula death; farm jobs in vermont with housing Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. Thank you for visiting nature.com. LetPub - Scientific Journal Selector | Nature Energy ]]> or help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? you're still in the running. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Hi! good . My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. queensland figure skating. However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. Your IP:
Does "editor decision started" mean rejection in Nature journals? Hope that helps. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Got lab stories? Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. typoresubmitstagedecision sent to author&, proofproofnaturepublish, ScienceNatureScienceScience, Editor assigned (Peer-review) (discovery) (invention)novelunexpected)The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implicationsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsscienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsBoard of Reviewing EditorsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing Editorsscienceconnection, 22, Peer-review, Peer-review, 2. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision 771 BCE: Start of the Eastern Zhou dynasty (and the 'Spring and Autumn Annals' period) in China 753 BCE: The Founding of Rome 594 BCE: Solon is appointed archon of Athens and proposes popular reforms; a system of land taxation introduced in the state of Lu, China 575 BCE: Servius Tullius becomes King of Rome 560 BCE: Peisistratus seizes the Acropolis, makes himself tyrant of Athens, but is . One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . [CDATA[// >Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF //--> I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); rev2023.3.3.43278. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). Peer review comments, cover letter and more. You don't need to, and shouldn't, make a rash decision. Decisions, decisions | Nature Neuroscience Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. [CDATA[> It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. That's it . 1124. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. Thanks! Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Because it was sitting in my barn / shop for over 12 years!! What does Enterococcus faecalis look like.
Journal Said "Major Revisions" Needed? Here's What to Do Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? You said the finals started tomorrow. Thanks! It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. //-->Reviewing excellence - Boer - Creativity and Innovation Management How do I align things in the following tabular environment? 117. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. ISSN 1476-4687 (online) Authors are free to discuss their paper with the media from six days before the publication date, and are asked to ensure that Nature Research's embargo conditions are understood by journalists and others. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19?
What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Decision in progress means all the reviews have already been received and whats left is for the editor to make a decision. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. In my experience rejection is quite rapid - 48 hours or so. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. 2002 Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. Do the revisions and resubmit.
How, when, and why you should appeal an editor's decision - Cell [CDATA[>
In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project. [CDATA[// >Physical Review X - Editorial Policies and Practices So dont feel upset!
The American School : From The Puritans To The Trump Era [PDF If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. The paper is rejected because the referees have raised considerable technical objections and/or the authors claim has not been adequately established. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). n/a. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. How did it go for you after this? This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. //-->How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora If Nature's editors agree to reconsider a paper, the other original referee(s) will have the chance to see and comment on the report of the referee who is the subject of the complaint. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes.
sciencenature - What does editor decision started mean nature?
Reviews for "Nature" - Page 1 - SciRev Sovereignty - Wikipedia Their role is to. I love to write and share science related Stuff Here on my Website. The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. //-->Editorial criteria and processes | Nature In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review. Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing.
MDPI | The Editorial Process The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision.
Frontiers | Editors between Support and Control by the Digital Yes, its appropriate. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer.